Designing Open Democracy
A note on this entry: every other page in the Democracy Landscape is DOD monitoring an organisation from the outside, arm's length, no formal relationship. This one is different — DOD writing about itself, on its own site. Read it with that in mind rather than as independent verification.
Designing Open Democracy (DOD) is an Australian-operated, nonpartisan forum of process engineers, social architects, and philosophers exploring how technology, engineering, and the design of social systems can be applied to democracy at every level of society. It is agnostic about which democratic model is right, but not about whether a system is genuinely trying to serve its people — see the Accountability Framework for how that distinction gets applied in practice.
DOD held its first meetup in December 2016, in the middle of the same wave of protest-born civic-tech efforts — Loomio, DemocracyOS, vTaiwan, Flux — documented in Occupy to Plurality. Rather than build a platform or run for office, DOD took a third path: podcasting, hosting meetups, and — since 2026 — maintaining this site as a public "Democracy Landscape" documenting other organisations' efforts, including the ones that came and went before DOD started writing any of this down.
Meta-organisation
Some in the group describe DOD as a meta-organisation — its role is to pay attention across the reform landscape rather than push any one mechanism, on the premise that most reform ideas being tried have been tried before and the lesson shouldn't have to be re-learned from scratch each time. It's a premise held by a few people in the group, not a settled institutional position — see Philosophy for it posed as an open question.
What DOD does
- Podcast and meetups — recorded discussions with practitioners, researchers, and people building democracy-reform projects, going back to 2016
- The Democracy Landscape — this site's organisations index, tracking who's working on what, whether they're still active, and what happened when they weren't
- The Accountability Framework — DOD's standard for what belongs in the Democracy Landscape, applied non-partisanly and symmetrically, including to liberal democracies
- Blog and retrospectives — analysis connecting DOD's own eight-plus years of discussion to what's happening in the wider reform space now
Links
- Website: designingopendemocracy.com
- Telegram — main point of contact; day-to-day discussion and coordination
- Meetup and Humanitix — Melbourne in-person events
- YouTube — recorded meetups and talks
- Podcast
- GitHub — this site's source, open to pull requests
See also
- About — DOD's own fuller self-description
- Community — how to get involved
- Philosophy — open discussion space, including disagreement with DOD's own framework
- Accountability Framework
- Meta-Organisation
- Occupy to Plurality: what the 2010s civic-tech wave built, and where it stalled
Upcoming events
-
2026-09-15
Co-hosting "International Day of Democracy: democracy beyond the ballot box" panel with 888 Co-operative Causeway
Sourcing: High
To celebrate International Day of Democracy and in the lead up to a Victorian State election, 888 Co-operative Causeway and Designing Open Democracy are pleased to host a Melbourne discussion on democracy beyond the ballot box.
Panel at The Kelvin Club, Melbourne, on democratic practices beyond voting (citizens' juries, deliberative technologies, co-operative enterprise), with Nicholas Gruen (CEO, Lateral Economics) as first announced speaker.
↗ View source
History
-
2016-12-19
Held its first meetup
Sourcing: High
Thanks very much to all who were able to attend the first Designing Open Democracy Meetup!
DOD's own mirror of the original meetup.com post-meeting message, dated 19 December 2016 — a more specific source than the generic meetup.com group page this event previously cited.
↗ View source -
2018-02-10
Published its "Proposed (Initial) Strategy" outlining the group's founding direction
Sourcing: High
Designing Open Democracy so far has centered on the niche topic of “Democratic System Reform” and is a gathering of minds to think about ways that our current system could be improved, without endorsing any particular system.
↗ View source